Docs / Dashboard

Options Max Pain

Options max-pain pins for BTC, ETH, and SOL, plus Futures Max Pain — the largest pending liquidation clusters above and below price.

What max pain is

For any option expiry, max pain is the price at which the total value of all outstanding options is lowest — the level where option buyers collectively lose the most and writers lose the least. Because dealer hedging flows tend to compress price toward heavily-sold strikes as expiry approaches, max pain is a widely watched “pin” candidate, especially into the Friday expiry window.

What Athena publishes

  • Assets: BTC, ETH, and SOL, computed from Deribit options open interest (the deepest crypto options venue), with spot reference from Binance.
  • Expiries: the front weekly, monthly, and quarterly max-pain strike per asset, shown against current spot. Fronts roll automatically after the Friday 08:00 UTC settlement. (SOL lists no monthlies on Deribit, so its monthly slot is empty by design.)
  • Refresh: every 4 hours.

How to read it

  • Distance matters. Spot pinned near max pain into a Friday is unremarkable; spot several percent away late in the week sets up the classic “gravity” debate — watch whether price drifts toward the pin as theta burns.
  • Weekly drives, monthly/quarterly contextualize. The weekly expiry carries the most immediate hedging flow; the larger expiries mark bigger structural magnets that matter as their dates approach.
  • Confluence beats any single level. The Telegram 🧲 Magnet Board scores exactly this — whether the options pin, the liquidation skew, the heaviest liquidation cluster, and the biggest order-book wall point the same way.
Note

Max pain is a positioning artifact, not a promise — in strongly trending or high-gamma weeks price ignores the pin entirely. Athena’s own forward-testing ranks it as context, weaker than the liquidation-structure reads it is paired with.

Futures Max Pain (liquidation clusters)

The futures companion card maps pending liquidation clusters: for each asset, the largest estimated pending-liquidation cluster sitting above and below the current price, with the dollar size of each cluster.

  • Ranges: three build-up windows — positions accumulated over the trailing 12 hours, 24 hours, and 3 days. Longer windows accumulate more open risk, so their clusters are typically larger.
  • Assets: the dashboard card shows BTC, ETH, and SOL; the underlying public feed covers the full dashboard universe.
  • Refresh: every 4 hours.

How to read the clusters

  • Asymmetry is the read. A much larger cluster on one side of price tells you where a move would meet the most forced liquidation flow — useful context for stop placement and for judging which direction a squeeze would feed on.
  • Compare the windows. A level that shows up across the 12-hour, 24-hour, and 3-day windows marks a zone where positioning has been building persistently, not just an intraday blip.
  • Pair it with the structure reads. The Liquidation Gravity section describes the same forced-liquidation landscape from a different angle; the two are complements, not confirmations.
Descriptive structure, not a price magnet

Unlike the options pin story above, Athena makes no “gravity” claim here: her own forward-testing found no reliable pull of price toward these clusters. Read the card as market-structure awareness — where forced-liquidation liquidity sits, and how lopsided it is — not as a target price is expected to reach.

Liquidation Heatmap

The heatmap card renders the full estimated-liquidation map for BTC, ETH, and SOL on Binance — price on the vertical axis, time on the horizontal, colour for the estimated volume of leveraged positions that would be forced to close at each level — over 24-hour, 7-day, and 30-day windows, refreshed every 4 hours. The map is a model inferred from open-interest changes under assumed leverage tiers, not observed positions, and the card says so.

  • Realized prints. Athena’s own capture of liquidation orders (≥ $100k, all venues) is drawn on the map — long liquidations in pink, short liquidations in green — so you can see where forced closes actually printed against where the model placed them.
  • Band age. The side profile shades each level by how long it has persisted; clusters older than two days are flagged persistent. Age comes from Athena’s own four-hourly snapshots once they have accrued (the vendor recomputes its history), and the card states which source is in use.
  • Model agreement. A dot marks levels that two different leverage models both rank among their largest — a cluster that exists under one assumption only is a weaker read.
  • Options on the same axis. The front monthly and quarterly max-pain levels from the Options Observatory are drawn on the map.
  • Clusters table. Contiguous bands merged into clusters with side, distance from spot, estimated volume, age, and agreement.
  • Enclave alerts. The same clusters drive two event-driven alerts in the Enclave’s Market Events feed: a sizeable new pocket forming close to spot, and a standing pocket being swept as price trades through it, together with the realized liquidation prints recorded in that band. Both are labeled descriptive.
  • Athena levels (token holders). Holders also see Athena’s own reads on the same axis — the near-pull target and deep pocket, the deep-skew read, and the dealer-gamma flip from the Options Observatory. Everyone else sees the public map and a note on what unlocks.